MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901737534 · doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2881433

Fast and Efficient Aerial Climbing of Vertical Surfaces Using Fixed-Wing UAVs

2018· article· en· W2901737534 on OpenAlex
Dino Mehanovic, David Rancourt, Alexis Lussier Desbiens

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsClimbClimbingThrustDragAerospace engineeringWingAerodynamicsDroneReduction (mathematics)Marine engineeringFixed wingSimulationAutomotive engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present improvements to Sherbrooke's multimodal autonomous drone (S-MAD), a microspine-based perching fixed-wing UAV that enables thrust-assisted climbing along vertical surfaces. Aircraft models are used to predict the performance of various aerial climb regimes and to design a controller for wall distance tracking. It is found that fast, long, and vertical climbs are favorable. Both short and long vertical autonomous climb maneuvers are demonstrated on rough surfaces (e.g., brick, roofing shingles). Results show that the S-MAD compares favorably with existing climbers, reaching a specific resistance of 19 with a much faster vertical speed (i.e., 2 m/s). A reduction in S-MAD's aerodynamic drag and an improved motor efficiency could bring its specific resistance down to 7, at a vertical speed of 5 m/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it