Overexpression of acid ceramidase (ASAH1) protects retinal cells (ARPE19) from oxidative stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over 11 million people in the United States alone have some form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Oxidative stress, cell death, and the degeneration of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells contribute to AMD pathology. Recent evidence suggests that ceramide (Cer), a cellular sphingolipid mediator that acts as a second messenger to induce apoptosis, might play a role in RPE cell death. The lysosomal breakdown of Cer by acid ceramidase [ N -acylsphingosine amidohydrolase (ASAH)1] into sphingosine (Sph) is the major source for Sph 1-phosphate production, which has an opposing role to Cer and provides cytoprotection. Here, we investigated the role of Cer in human RPE-derived ARPE19 cells under hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress, and show that Cer and hexosyl-Cer levels increase in the oxidatively stressed ARPE19 cells, which can be prevented by overexpression of lysosomal ASAH1. This study demonstrates that oxidative stress generates sphingolipid death mediators in retinal cells and that induction of ASAH1 could rescue retinal cells from oxidative stress by hydrolyzing excess Cers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".