MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901816560 · doi:10.4000/palethnologie.425

Pour une archéologie sociale sur les sites de Droulers/Tsiionhiakwatha et Mailhot-Curran

2016· article· fr· W2901816560 on OpenAlex
Claude Chapdelaine

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalethnologie · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCurranClanPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’archéologie sociale des Iroquoiens du Saint-Laurent est au centre de nos préoccupations et c’est à l’aide de la poterie domestique et d’une analyse spatiale des vestiges provenant de deux sites villageois de la région de Saint-Anicet que nous discuterons des maisonnées. Les villages Droulers et Mailhot-Curran retiendront notre attention. Droulers représente un village de la fin du XVe siècle et il est à ce jour le plus gros village iroquoien connu au Québec avec une superficie estimée à 1,3 ha. Il y a lieu de croire que le site pouvait abriter une population de 500 personnes réparties dans une douzaine de résidences multifamiliales. Le site Mailhot-Curran est un village du XVIe siècle plus modeste avec six maisons-longues réparties sur une superficie de 0,6 ha et une population estimée à 200 personnes. Les maisonnées sélectionnées permettent l’étude de certains aspects sociaux dont les rapports de proximité entre les occupants et leur appartenance à un clan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it