Pour une archéologie sociale sur les sites de Droulers/Tsiionhiakwatha et Mailhot-Curran
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’archéologie sociale des Iroquoiens du Saint-Laurent est au centre de nos préoccupations et c’est à l’aide de la poterie domestique et d’une analyse spatiale des vestiges provenant de deux sites villageois de la région de Saint-Anicet que nous discuterons des maisonnées. Les villages Droulers et Mailhot-Curran retiendront notre attention. Droulers représente un village de la fin du XVe siècle et il est à ce jour le plus gros village iroquoien connu au Québec avec une superficie estimée à 1,3 ha. Il y a lieu de croire que le site pouvait abriter une population de 500 personnes réparties dans une douzaine de résidences multifamiliales. Le site Mailhot-Curran est un village du XVIe siècle plus modeste avec six maisons-longues réparties sur une superficie de 0,6 ha et une population estimée à 200 personnes. Les maisonnées sélectionnées permettent l’étude de certains aspects sociaux dont les rapports de proximité entre les occupants et leur appartenance à un clan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".