Comment faire communauté autrement au sein de l’État anglodominant canadien ? Le cas des Fransaskois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Éparpillés sur un vaste territoire majoritairement anglophone, les Fransaskois partagent un désir de « faire communauté », c’est-à-dire de vivre une vie pleine en français aux côtés de leurs voisins anglophones. Comment cette « petite » communauté envisage-t-elle de faire communauté au sein de l’État anglodominant canadien ? À partir d’une analyse qualitative de discours, ce texte cherche à définir les aspirations politiques des Fransaskois. L’analyse révèle une volonté persistante de renverser le rapport de domination entre la communauté fransaskoise et l’État. Le désir des Fransaskois d’exercer un contrôle sur leur destinée s’exprime non seulement par la réorientation des revendications politiques de leurs leaders, mais aussi par la restructuration périodique de leurs structures et processus de gouvernance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".