MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901865231 · doi:10.1177/0954410018809468

Hybrid frequency domain control for large flexible structures

2018· article· en· W2901865231 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Damaren, Xibin Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian StudiesUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Frequency domainPassivityActuatorAutomatic frequency controlVibration controlVibrationLemma (botany)Computer scienceEngineeringControl (management)AcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hybrid finite frequency controller is proposed for the vibration suppression of a large flexible structure mounted with collocated sensors and actuators. The controller has passive characteristics at low frequencies and small gain characteristics at high frequencies. Compared with a strictly positive real controller based on the standard Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma, the hybrid finite frequency controller has less energy consumption but can obtain approximately identical performance. Furthermore, when the plant passivity is violated at high frequencies by noncollocation of sensors and actuators, the strictly positive real controller based on the Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma is no longer able to attenuate the vibration of the large flexible structures, while the hybrid finite frequency controller is effective in suppressing the vibration and avoiding spillover instability. Simulation results are presented to validate the effectiveness of the hybrid finite frequency controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace EngineeringSame topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207