MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901866006 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2018.8518540

Hierarchical Band Selection Using the N-Dimensional Solid Spectral Angle Method to Address Inter- and Intra- Class Spectral Variability

2018· article· en· W2901866006 on OpenAlexaff
Yaqian Long, Benoît Rivard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingComputer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)Spectral bandsPattern recognition (psychology)EndmemberClass (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceRemote sensingGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contiguous narrow bands in hyperspectral data can hamper the accurate discrimination of targets especially for spectrally similar materials. The N-dimensional Solid Spectral Angle (NSSA) is a novel method that selects important bands for the maximum spectral separation of materials. This paper proposed a strategy of hierarchical band selection based on the NSSA method to address inter-and intra-class variability among materials. Bands are separately selected from different hierarchies of categorized materials using NSSA and the individual band sets are then combined. To evaluate this Hierarchical Band Selection with NSSA (HBS-NSSA), two hyperspectral datasets were analyzed that include airborne image endmembers for geological mapping and leaf spectra for tree species discrimination. Selected bands agree well with known features identified from expert knowledge. The results suggest that the HBS-NSSA method is both practical and effective and could be easily adopted in any other fields of application with spectrally similar materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207