Hierarchical Band Selection Using the N-Dimensional Solid Spectral Angle Method to Address Inter- and Intra- Class Spectral Variability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The contiguous narrow bands in hyperspectral data can hamper the accurate discrimination of targets especially for spectrally similar materials. The N-dimensional Solid Spectral Angle (NSSA) is a novel method that selects important bands for the maximum spectral separation of materials. This paper proposed a strategy of hierarchical band selection based on the NSSA method to address inter-and intra-class variability among materials. Bands are separately selected from different hierarchies of categorized materials using NSSA and the individual band sets are then combined. To evaluate this Hierarchical Band Selection with NSSA (HBS-NSSA), two hyperspectral datasets were analyzed that include airborne image endmembers for geological mapping and leaf spectra for tree species discrimination. Selected bands agree well with known features identified from expert knowledge. The results suggest that the HBS-NSSA method is both practical and effective and could be easily adopted in any other fields of application with spectrally similar materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it