MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901904168

Obtención por vía recombinante de dos citadhesinas de Mycoplasma gallisepticum

2018· article· es· W2901904168 on OpenAlexaff
José Antonio Agüero-Fernández, Andy Potter, José Perez‐Casal

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de salud animal · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycoplasma gallisepticumRecombinant DNABiologyBacteriaGeneMicrobiologyMycoplasmaMolecular cloningCloning (programming)AntigenPlasmidSecretionBacterial adhesinEscherichia coliMolecular biologyGene expressionGeneticsBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mycoplasmas, known as the simplest self-replicating organisms, are distinguished phenotypically from other bacteria by their minute size and total lack of cell wall. The poultry industry is affected by several species of mycoplasmas but Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) is the most economically significant one. The attachment of mycoplasmas to the host respiratory epithelial cells constitutes a critical step in the pathway leading to infection and disease, and it is achieved by lipoproteins localized on the bacterial surface. GapA and CrmA proteins showed to be critical in this adhesion process, as well as in further disease development. In this work, the molecular cloning of these genes coding for both proteins, as well as their expression, purification and immunogenic response induced by the obtained products, are described. Only a fragment of gapA gene was cloned, while crmA was full lenfht cloned as designed. In both cases, the obtained recombinant proteins were fragmented but this fact did not affect the purification process by the Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC). At the end of the process, the final products conserved their antigenic properties. These recombinant products could be used for future studies related to the pathogenic mechanisms of this bacterium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de salud animalSame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207