EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIVITIES FOR WOMEN EVALUATION (IRAN PROJECT) IN AGRICULTURAL BANK BRANCHES OF TABRIZ CITY, IRAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this research is Effectiveness of activities for women evaluation (Iran project) in Agricultural Bank branches of Tabriz city. To investigate this research, to answer four main research question, with two of economic, social goals and four hypotheses have tested and to test this hypothesis, questionnaires in three different population (with the aim of customer satisfaction assess and survey of managers and employees) self-made set and surveyed. Results showed that average customer satisfaction (77.32) is the value that located in the second quartile and since the second quartile range is 73 to 78 and considering that average pointed at the second quarter, therefore we can say that customer satisfaction or by the other words Iran project effectiveness among customers is lower than average. Average employee’s satisfaction (86.10) was located lower than average of second quartile. Average manager’s satisfaction (96.70) was located higher than average of third quartile. In other words, managers' satisfaction is higher than average. Article visualizations:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".