Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une analyse des changements économiques chez les Innus d’Unamen Shipu (La Romaine) à partir des concepts de valeur, de mode de production et de personne tels que formulés par David Graeber et Terence Turner. Cette position théorique amène à reconsidérer le mode de production traditionnel innu en termes de production de personne. L’émergence des relations capitalistes chez les Innus a amené son lot de contradictions et d’adaptations dans l’univers innu. La continuité de la production de la personne innue dépendant de l’intégrité du territoire, l’auteur démontre comment a émergé un régime de valeur basé sur le territoire qui s’oppose au régime de la valeur-travail. L’article se termine sur une analyse des modalités d’échange des produits du territoire et montre comment les règles traditionnelles qui dictaient la circulation de ces produits se recomposent dans un contexte de généralisation des transactions monétaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".