Polymorphisms of the cytidine deaminase APOBEC3F have different HIV-1 restriction efficiencies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The APOBEC3 enzyme family are host restriction factors that induce mutagenesis of HIV-1 proviral genomes through the deamination of cytosine to form uracil in nascent single-stranded (-)DNA. HIV-1 suppresses APOBEC3 activity through the HIV-1 protein Vif that induces APOBEC3 degradation. Here we compared two common polymorphisms of APOBEC3F. We found that although both polymorphisms have HIV-1 restriction activity, APOBEC3F 108 A/231V can restrict HIV-1 ΔVif up to 4-fold more than APOBEC3F 108 S/231I and is partially protected from Vif-mediated degradation. This resulted from higher levels of steady state expression of APOBEC3F 108 A/231 V. Individuals are commonly heterozygous for the APOBEC3F polymorphisms and these polymorphisms formed in cells, independent of RNA, hetero-oligomers between each other and with APOBEC3G. Hetero-oligomerization with APOBEC3F 108 A/231V resulted in partial stabilization of APOBEC3F 108 S/231I and APOBEC3G in the presence of Vif. These data demonstrate functional outcomes of APOBEC3 polymorphisms and hetero-oligomerization that affect HIV-1 restriction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".