MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Corporate Strategy and Public Policy for Climate Change Impact Mitigation

2012· article· en· W2901974696 on OpenAlexaff
Charles A. Backman, Alain Verbeke, Bob Schulz

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperationalizationCorporate governanceClimate changeBusinessResource (disambiguation)Conceptual frameworkEnvironmental resource managementProcess managementIndustrial organizationKnowledge managementEnvironmental economicsEconomicsComputer scienceSociologyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

: In this paper, we develop a new conceptual framework using the natural resource based view of Hart (1995) as operationalized by Buysse and Verbeke (2003). Based on four resource domains within the firm: (1) Governance Capability; (2) Information management capability; (3) Systemic capability; and (4) Technology investments, we describe the G I S T Framework/model of firm-level climate change strategies and then make public policy recommendations to facilitate a more proactive stance by firms to climate change. Recommendations focus on Governance, Information, Systemic, and Technology domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.342
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.101 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207