MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901987489 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v10n4p155

Synthesis, Crystal Structures, Thermal and Antimicrobial Properties of Mn(II) Complexes of 1,10-Phenanthroline With Some Co-Ligands

2018· article· en· W2901987489 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Donatus Bekindaka Eni, Divine Mbom Yufanyi‬, Che Dieudonné Tabong, R. Jagan, Moise Ondoh Agwaraa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBaylor University
KeywordsChemistryThiocyanateOrthorhombic crystal systemMonoclinic crystal systemCrystallographyOctahedral molecular geometryPhenanthrolineOctahedronMagnetic susceptibilityThiazoleCrystal structureSingle crystalManganeseDicyanamideCoordination complexInorganic chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistryMetal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complexes of Manganese(II) with 1,10-phenanthroline using the nitrate, thiocyanate and dicyanamide as co-ligands have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, infrared spectroscopy, thermal analysis and room temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements. The magnetic moments of the complexes are consistent with high spin (d5) octahedral geometry. Single-crystal X-ray analysis confirmed the complexes to be [Mn(Phen)2(NO3)2] (1), [Mn(Phen)2(N3)2)] (2), and [Mn(Phen)2(dca)2)] (3). Complexes 1 and 2 crystallize in an orthorhombic crystal system with space group Pbcn while complex 3 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system with space group P21/c. The complexes have been screened for in vitro antibacterial and antifungal activities by the disc diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration values indicate that the complexes showed greater activity against the fungi strains tested compared to that of the reference antifungal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207