MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2901996923 · doi:10.1136/bmj.k4766

Assessment and initial management of acute undifferentiated fever in tropical and subtropical regions

2018· article· en· W2901996923 on OpenAlexaff
Anurag Bhargava, Ravikar Ralph, Biswaroop Chatterjee, Emmanuel Bottieau

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubtropicsTropicsGeographyEnvironmental scienceBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

### What you need to know Acute undifferentiated febrile illnesses (AUFI) are characterised by fever of less than two weeks’ duration without organ-specific symptoms at the onset.1 These may begin with headache, chills, and myalgia. Later, specific organs may be involved. AUFIs can range from mild and self limiting disease to progressive, life threatening illness. A mortality rate of 12% has been reported in severely ill hospitalised patients in tropical regions.2 AUFIs are classified into malaria and non-malarial illnesses with the help of microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests for malaria.3 The overlap of epidemiological and clinical features often renders clinical diagnosis difficult. There is greater focus on non-malarial AUFIs with the decline of malaria in many regions of the world.4 They account for 20-50% of all fevers in children over 5 years of age and adults in Asia and Africa.5 Laboratory confirmation is difficult—in contrast to malaria and dengue, for which high accuracy rapid diagnostic tests are now available. Current guidelines do not comprehensively address undifferentiated infections, which can fuel indiscriminate use of antimalarials …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207