MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902005916 · doi:10.23919/eumc.2018.8541368

Characterization of Phase Change Material Germanium Telluride for RF Switches

2018· article· en· W2902005916 on OpenAlexaff
Tejinder Singh, Raafat R. Mansour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhase-change materials and chalcogenides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceWaferOptoelectronicsGermaniumFabricationTellurideRadio frequencySputteringRF switchPhase (matter)SiliconThin filmElectrical engineeringNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the simulation and measured results of a phase-change material (PCM) based radio-frequency (RF) switch optimized to improve the ratio between OFF-state and ON-state resistivity. Various samples having germanium telluride (GeTe) films are developed and imaged using Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) and are compared with cross-wafer resistance measurement results to determine the optimum sputtering conditions of the GeTe films. A simple four-layer fabrication process for GeTe based switches is presented. Several switches with different micro-heater dimensions are compared to investigate the performance of heater and its impact on the isolation performance of switch. A compact RF series switch has been measured, demonstrating an insertion loss of only 0.29 dB and an OFF-state isolation better than 23dB over DC-26 GHz frequency range, yielding a relatively high Roff/Ron ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesFrench-language works237,207