Fuzzy Optimization-based Sizing of a Battery Energy Storage System for Participating in Ancillary Services Markets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the accelerated advancements in battery manufacturing recently, battery energy storage systems (BESS) have become more economically viable than ever before for power grid applications. Given their fast response, BESS are known for their efficacy in providing ancillary services (AS), such as frequency regulation and reserve services, to the bulk power grid. However, for an investor willing to provide AS to the electricity markets via BESS, properly sizing the storage system presents a challenge. In this paper, a BESS sizing optimization model is proposed. The model aims to identify the BESS optimal power and energy capacities that maximize the investor's long-term profitability. The optimization model considers the physical properties of BESS, such as degradation due to cycling. It also accounts for the uncertainties associated with the AS markets, mainly inaccurate AS price forecasts. To ensure computational tractability, the optimization is modeled as a fuzzy linear program (FLP). To verify its effectiveness, the proposed FLP-based optimization is compared with its deterministic counterpart. Simulation results using real data obtained from the ERCOT market demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed FLP-based model, as compared to its deterministic counterpart, in identifying the optimal BESS size in a computationally tractable manner while capturing the market-related uncertainties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".