الصراع الدولي حول البحر الأبيض المتوسط خلال الحملة الفرنسية على مصر 1798 و موقف أوجاق الغرب من خلال الوثائق الأرشيفية و بعض المصادر
Bibliographic record
Abstract
الملخص في هذا الموضوع حاولنا التطرق إلى أهم العوامل التي أدت إلى تزايد أهمية البحر الأبيض المتوسط خلال الربع الأخير من القرن الثامن عشر و بداية القرن التاسع عشر في العلاقات الأوروبية العثمانية . أيضا تمت مناقشة وتحليل الصراع الدولي بالمتوسط خلال الحملة الفرنسية على مصر و دور أوجاق الغرب وحركة القرصنة بإعتبارهم ورقة ضغط بيد الباب العالي, دورهم في التحولات السياسية التي عرفها المتوسط و أيضا أوروبا . ABSTRACT The international conflict in the Mediterranean during Napoleon's campaign in Egypt and the role of the West Auajjaq is discussed and analyzed. The following consequences are also discussed the importance of the uprising in the Mediterranean during the last quarter of the eighteenth century. The changes in the international relations during that period including their effects on relations between the Sublime Porte and the greater European powers, as well as between the European power themselves. And also the effective roles played by pirates and governments of West Auajjaq in utilizing their strategic Mediterranean position as a pressure card by the Sublime Port in their foreign relations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.292 | 0.275 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".