The Addition of Glenohumeral Adductor Coactivation to a Rotator Cuff Exercise Program for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatments for rotator cuff tendinopathy include rotator cuff muscle strengthening to promote better muscle recruitment in order to minimize subacromial narrowing during active movement. Glenohumeral adductor recruitment has also been shown to prevent such narrowing in asymptomatic individuals; therefore, adding glenohumeral adductor coactivation during rotator cuff strengthening could enhance the efficacy of rotator cuff strengthening. However, no study has explored its benefits. OBJECTIVES: To compare the short-term efficacy of adding glenohumeral adductor coactivation to a rotator cuff-strengthening program to improve function, reduce symptoms, and increase acromiohumeral distance in adults with rotator cuff tendinopathy. METHODS: In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, 42 participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy were randomly assigned to 2 groups, one that received strengthening of the scapular and rotator cuff muscles or one that received rotator cuff strengthening plus coactivation with pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi recruitment. The daily programs were performed at home for 6 weeks, with supervised training and follow-up sessions. Functional limitations/symptoms (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaire as the primary outcome, and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index), pain (visual analog scale), and acromiohumeral distance were measured at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks. Data were analyzed using a mixed-model analysis of variance. RESULTS: No significant group-by-time interaction was observed for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, visual analog scale, and acromiohumeral distance (P≥.055). Significant time effects were obtained for the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index and visual analog scale for pain with movement (P<.001). CONCLUSION: The present findings show that adding glenohumeral adductor coactivation to a rotator cuff-strengthening program does not result in improved short-term efficacy in any of the measured outcomes. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02837848). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 1b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(3):126-135. Epub 30 Nov 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8240.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".