MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902109457 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.2018.8544835

Wetting and Self-Cleaning Properties of Silicone Rubber Surfaces Treated by Atmospheric Plasma Jet

2018· article· en· W2902109457 on OpenAlexafffund
E. Vazirinasab, Reza Jafari, Gelareh Momen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSilicone rubberWettingMaterials scienceComposite materialSurface roughnessNatural rubberContact angleAtmospheric-pressure plasmaSurface finishPlasma cleaningSurface energyPlasmaJet (fluid)SiliconeChemical engineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accumulation of ice and/or pollution on outdoor power transmission lines can cause serious problems. To reduce the potential for severe ice/pollution accumulation, nature-inspired superhydrophobic surfaces having non-wetting and self-cleaning properties have drawn much focus. In this study, an atmospheric-pressure air plasma jet produced superhydrophobic surfaces by creating surface roughness on low surface energy silicone rubber. The effect of plasma parameters on the water repellency of silicone rubber was assessed using the design of experiment (DoE) method focused on three parameters: plasma power, the number of passes and the gas flow rate. FTIR and profilometry analysis characterized the chemical composition and roughness of the treated silicone rubber surfaces. Eventually, the micro-structured silicone rubber surface created by plasma treatment led to superhydrophobic properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207