MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902174146 · doi:10.3138/cmlr.2017-0038

Exploration de l’évolution des commentaires métagraphiques relatifs à l’accord du verbe en nombre chez des élèves de la fin de l’élémentaire scolarisés dans le Sud-Ouest ontarien

2018· article· en· W2902174146 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Joël Thibeault, Pascale Lefrançois

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVerbLinguisticsContext (archaeology)HumanitiesReflection (computer programming)PsychologyPhilosophyHistoryComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the evolution of the verbalizations of three students finishing elementary school in Southwestern Ontario after they completed written tasks on subject-verb agreement in number. Results show that the students used a wide variety of cognitive procedures to spell out their verbs and that those who succeeded the most are also those who, via a morphosyntactic type of linguistic reflection, found the word that shared its grammatical number with the verb. Using this data, we propose pedagogical practices that take into account students who are schooled in French in a linguistic minority context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantesSame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207