MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902213044

Fluorspar market on edge as new participants step in

2018· article· en· W2902213044 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Greenfield

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Supply and demandBalance (ability)Gauge (firearms)Quality (philosophy)Point (geometry)Consistency (knowledge bases)CLARITYBusinessChinaOperations managementCommerceIndustrial organizationMarketingEconomicsMicroeconomicsGeographyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With demand currently strong and little clarity about when, or if, the idled operations in China will come back on stream, the expected production from Canada Fluorspar and Sepfluor could create the next pinch point for the market’s supply-demand balance. Sepfluor will serve a wide range of users via shipments of 5,000-8,000 tonnes until June next year, allowing consumers to gauge the consistency and quality of the material and to decide whether it can be accepted in their own production systems, according to Wagner. Unless there is a significant shift in demand, this makes the long-term effects of the Chinese environmental controls the major driver of the market’s supply-and-demand balance, and therefore of prices. Magnitude is considering “the restart of a third and final pot line of primary production capacity, if and when market conditions allow,” chief executive officer Robert Prusak has told Metal Bulletin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1340.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207