MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902244362 · doi:10.1109/ias.2018.8544527

A Novel MRAC Strategy for Fault Impact Mitigation in HVDC-Connected Offshore Wind Farm System

2018· article· en· W2902244362 on OpenAlexaff
Mounir Benadja, Miloud Rezkallah, Seghir Benhalima, Fadoul Souleyman Tidjani, Ab. Hamadi, Ambrish Chandra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Fault (geology)Offshore wind powerPermanent magnet synchronous generatorWind powerExtended Kalman filterElectric power systemKalman filterEngineeringComputer scienceVoltagePower (physics)Control (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a strategy for fault impact mitigation in high-voltage direct current (HVDC) connected offshore wind farm (OWF) system. The OWF contains hundred and fifty variable speed wind turbines (VSWT) using permanent-magnet synchronous generator (PMSG). Each VSWT/PMSG in the OWF has its own ac-dc converter, through which these VSWT/PMSGs are interconnected in series. Technically, the good quality of power is ensured even with the presence of a fault using a new control method based on the model reference adaptive control (MRAC). This technique uses the error between the reference model and the real HVDC system to decrease the fault impact occurred in HVDC system through an adjustment mechanism. Further, integration of the nonlinear observers based on extended Kalman filter (EKF) which guarantee good estimation of the PMSG's speed and rotor position and that of the dc-bus voltage of the offshore side dc-ac inverter thereby eliminating expensive sensors and making the system economical. Effectiveness of the proposed method is analyzed with and without fault compensations of the system. Performance simulation of the proposed system using Matlab shows excellent results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207