MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902292639

Gardening, Stewardship and Worn-out Metaphors: Richard II and Justin Trudeau

2018· article· en· W2902292639 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Crover

Bibliographic record

VenueTigerPrints (Clemson University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)Environmental ethicsPolitical scienceLawPhilosophyPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

hakespeare's Richard II raises the spectre of a kingdom and an environment gone awry because of the failure of good management. 1 The royal gardener lays out the problem: "what a pity is it / That [Richard] had not so trimmed and dressed his land/ As we this garden . . .Had he done so to great and growing men, / They might have lived to bear, and he to taste, / Their fruits of duty (3.4.56-64).In this instance it is clear that the "garden" Richard has mismanaged is his subjects, but continued references to extravagance and land grabs to fund empty royal coffers throughout the play suggest that he has likewise mismanaged the "sea-walled garden" (3.4.42) of England, overtaxing what both the people and the land can give.Indeed, while there is little doubt in the play that Bolingbroke's invasion and subsequent coup is fueled by ambitious self-interest, the play has him frame his invasion as something very much akin to modern ecopolitical activism, on behalf of England (2.3.165-66).He arrives to set the garden back in order and return balance to the kingdom.Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's ambitious adoption of the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline in British Columbia raises concerns, I argue, that echo Richard II's preoccupation with eco-political balance.Trudeau and his government continue to represent this move as that of wise stewardship: balancing the needs of the environment against the needs of the economy.2 He appears to believe that his gift for the "common touch" with his citizens, as well as his optimistic, but relatively toothless, environmental gestures will lead his nation to accept or overlook his endorsement of conflicting initiatives like the pipeline.The escalating dispute over the pipeline between BC (who opposes it), Alberta (who stands to gain from it), and Trudeau's federal government, suggests that he, like Richard, may have critically underestimated the political climate when it comes to management of the nation.Canadian environmentalists and political commentators are watching the dispute over this pipeline closely, particularly in the wake of the ongoing Dakota Access Pipeline dispute across the border.The last time there was a major grassroots resistance to an industry project in BC (the Carmanah Valley Protests), in the nineties, the end result was a major political embarrassment for the BC government, and there is every possibility that the Trans Mountain Pipeline may be similarly politically disastrous for both the federal and provincial governments.Like Richard II and Bolingbroke before him, now S

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.041
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTigerPrints (Clemson University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207