Contributions of the nursing team in the second stage of the Kangaroo-Mother Care Method: Implications for hospital discharge of the newborn
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective: To know the main care procedures of the nursing team in the second stage of the Kangaroo Care Method that contribute to the hospital discharge of the newborn and the continuation of home care, and to prepare an explanatory brochure to guide professionals in the management of hospital discharge. Method: Qualitative, convergent care study, carried out with 17 nursing professionals from a reference maternity hospital. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus groups and analyzed through content analysis. Results: There were relevant concerns about the use of kangaroo position, about the skin-to-skin care and hygiene of the newborn, and about respiratory changes as a warning sign for intervention. A brochure was developed to showcase the essential care provided by the nursing professionals - its goal is the proper continuation of health care of premature or underweight babies. Conclusion and implications for the practice: Nursing teams can contribute to the clinical stability of the newborn in the second stage of the Kangaroo-Mother Care Method and elaborate educational interventions that guarantee the continuation of care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".