MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902313987 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2166

2514. Pediatric Medically Attended Shingles in Alberta, Canada 2016; Preliminary Results

2018· article· en· W2902313987 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephanie Booth, Margaret L. Russell, Bruce Mcdonald, Kimberley Simmonds, Lawrence W. Svenson, Christopher Bell, Shaun Malo, Douglas C. Dover

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Vectors
Canadian institutionsConcordia University of EdmontonUniversity of AlbertaGovernment of AlbertaMinistry of HealthUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShinglesMedicinePediatricsEpidemiologyPopulationVaccinationCohortChickenpoxChickenpox VaccineMedical recordImmunizationVaricella vaccineSurgeryInternal medicineVirusImmunologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herpes zoster (shingles) is a reactivation of latent varicella virus. Shingles is uncommon in children and children vaccinated against varicella may be at a reduced risk of shingles. Alberta has a publicly funded healthcare system and added publicly funded varicella vaccine to the routine childhood vaccination schedule in 2001. We used provincially held administrative health databases to examine the epidemiology of incident shingles cases in children under the age of 19. Incident shingles cases were defined as the earliest record of ICD-9-CM 053 OR ICD-10-CA B02 coded physician claims, hospital, or emergency room visits between 1985 and 2016, with incident cases in this cohort occurring between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. Varicella immunization was identified through Alberta’s immunization repository and immunosuppressive comorbid conditions (neoplasms, HIV/AIDS, cystic fibrosis, and immune system disorders) were identified using ICD diagnostic codes from physician claims, hospital, or emergency room visits and Alberta’s Communicable Disease Control databases. 1,003 incident shingles cases were identified in children under the age of 19 in 2016, a crude rate of 0.98/1,000 persons. Females comprised 54% of cases. The largest proportion of cases occurred among those aged 15–19 years. About 39% of cases were prescribed antiviral medication, most commonly those aged 15–19 years. The crude rate per 1,000 population increased with age: 0.5 for children under the age of 1, 1.2 for those 1–4 years, 1.25 for children 5–9 years, 2.19 for children 10–14 years, and 3.7 for children aged 15–19 years. Crude rates were similar among both males and females. Less than 3% of the cases had ever been immunized against varicella. Shingles diagnostic codes were not validated, which likely led to an overestimation of the true rates of disease. Additional studies are needed on pediatric shingles cases and factors that influence shingles in this group, as well as validation studies of ICD diagnostic coding in administrative data. M. L. Russell, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.: Grant Investigator and Unconditional Research Grant, Grant recipient. Merck Frosst Canada Inc.: Grant Investigator and Unconditional Research Grant, Grant recipient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicViral Infections and VectorsFrench-language works237,207