MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902318695 · doi:10.4208/cicp.oa-2018-0259

Explicit Computation of Robin Parameters in Optimized Schwarz Waveform Relaxation Methods for Schrödinger Equations Based on Pseudodifferential Operators

2020· article· en· W2902318695 on OpenAlexafffund
Xavier Antoine, Emmanuel Lorin

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Computational Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCarleton UniversityStatistics Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsDomain decomposition methodsConvergence (economics)Relaxation (psychology)Nonlinear systemWaveformPartial differential equationSchwarz alternating methodApplied mathematicsComputationComputer scienceRate of convergenceMathematicsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisFinite element methodPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Optimized Schwarz Waveform Relaxation algorithm, a domain decomposition method based on Robin transmission condition, is becoming a popular computational method for solving evolution partial differential equations in parallel. Along with well-posedness, it offers a good balance between convergence rate, efficient computational complexity and simplicity of the implementation. The fundamental question is the selection of the Robin parameter to optimize the convergence of the algorithm. In this paper, we propose an approach to explicitly estimate the Robin parameter which is based on the approximation of the transmission operators at the subdomain interfaces, for the linear/nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Some illustrating numerical experiments are proposed for the one- and two-dimensional problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Computational PhysicsSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207