MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902318790 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2883490

IoT-Enabled Machine Learning for an Algorithmic Spectrum Decision Process

2018· article· en· W2902318790 on OpenAlexafffund
Li Li, Amir Ghasemi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingProcess (computing)Internet of ThingsDecision support systemSet (abstract data type)The InternetData sharingMachine learningDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceComputer securityWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates a data centric approach for future regulatory spectrum management (SM). Spectrum sensing data are collected by a spectrum environment awareness system built on a cloud-based service of Internet of Things. The data are used to characterize channel behaviors and establish a sharing predictor model which enables a set of efficient machine learning algorithms for automated spectrum sharing decision making. The performance of the decision process is evaluated, illustrating the feasibility and potential of this novel SM approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207