Slurryability and combustion characteristics of coal‐coking wastewater‐slurry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The slurryability, rheological properties, stability, and combustion characteristics of coal water slurry (CWS), made from coking wastewater (CW), deionized water, and Shenhua coal were experimentally studied. Results showed that the solid concentration of coal‐coking wastewater‐slurry (CCWS) could be higher than 60.5 %, which is 0.5–1.5 % lower than that of coal water slurry (CWS). However, the pseudoplastic behaviour of CCWS was greatly evident. The dispersion effects of NNO and NDF were excellent. The stability of CCWS is better than CWS. Moreover, CCWS had lower ignition temperature and burnout temperature, higher combustion characteristic parameters, such as combustion characteristic index S and ignition stability index R w , and better performance in combustion than CWS. The application of CW for the production of coal water slurry demonstrated the resource utilization of wastewater and improved the combustion characteristic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it