MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902449465 · doi:10.4000/books.psn.8391

Entre la foi et l’ouverture aux autres : la Commission des écoles catholiques de Montréal, la promotion des valeurs chrétiennes et l’intégration des communautés culturelles (1973-1998)

2006· book-chapter· fr· W2902449465 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses Sorbonne Nouvelle eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse le discours des dirigeants de la Commission des écoles catholiques de Montréal (CECM) pour justifier leurs politiques de promotion des valeurs chrétiennes et d’intégration des nouveaux immigrants entre 1973 et 1998. Au cours de cette période, la volonté d’ouverture à l’ensemble des cultures prônée par la CECM et sa mission spécifique de former de bons catholiques vont, en effet, créer des tensions au sein même de cette importante institution scolaire publique. En tenant compte des nombreux bouleversements qui marquent cette période de vingt-cinq ans, nous tenterons de comprendre comment une grande commission scolaire urbaine, et résolument catholique, a fait face à l’arrivée massive d’immigrants allophones et souvent non catholiques. Cette analyse permet de mieux comprendre les rapports, souvent complexes, qui lient religion, éducation et intégration des communautés culturelles dans une société moderne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses Sorbonne Nouvelle eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207