Conserver la musique enregistrée, 1877-2017. Document, œuvre, expérience : trois paradigmes témoins d’un rapport changeant à la musique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si le désir de conserver et garantir de façon pérenne l’accessibilité à la musique comme performance date du romantisme, ce n’est qu’avec l’invention de la phonographie qu’il devient réalisable. Cet article analyse les relations entre enregistrement, performance et conservation au cours d’un long vingtième siècle (1877-2017). Il met au jour l’interdépendance entre dispositions envers la musique enregistrée et opérations de production, de conservation et de mise à disposition de la performance. Cette interdépendance conduit aux déplacements du statut et de la nature de la performance et des dispositifs de sa conservation entre trois paradigmes apparus successivement mais aujourd’hui coexistants : les paradigmes scientifique, selon lequel la performance est un document ; artistique, où elle existe en tant qu’œuvre ; et expérientiel, où elle vaut avant tout comme moment vécu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it