Survei Risiko Penyakit Diabetes Melitus Terhadap Masyarakat Kota Padang
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Telah dilakukan survei risiko penyakit diabetes melitus terhadap 348 orang masyarakat di Kota Padang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metoda cross sectional survey dengan pengambilan data secara prospektif. Pengumpulan data mengunakan kuesioner CANRISK (The Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire) dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji Mann-Whitney dan uji Kruskal-Wallis dengan tingkat signifikan α<0,05. Parameter yang diamati adalah kategori risiko dan faktor-faktor risiko yang berpengaruh terhadap diabetes melitus. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa 57,7% responden termasuk kedalam kategori risiko tinggi, 34,5% risiko sedang, dan 7,7% risiko rendah terhadap penyakit diabetes melitus. Faktor risiko yang memiliki pengaruh terhadap penyakit diabetes melitus adalah jenis kelamin, umur, BMI (Body Mass Index), lingkar pinggang, riwayat hipertensi, riwayat gula darah tinggi, riwayat keluarga positif diabetes, dan tingkat pendidikan. Sedangkan faktor risiko yang tidak berpengaruh terhadap penyakit diabetes melitus adalah aktivitas fisik, konsumsi buah/sayur setiap hari, dan etnis orang tua.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it