Storage and Propagation Characteristics of Miscanthus x giganteus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Miscanthus x giganteus Anderss. exhibits favourable characteristics as a dedicated second-generation biomass feedstock. Propagation of this sterile species occurs mainly through micropropagation or rhizome cuttings, resulting in high establishment costs. This thesis sought to investigate the improvement of storage duration for field-harvested rhizomes, prolongment of callus regeneration potential through impairment of the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway, and the induction of microrhizomes through the modification of media compositions. It was found that plant growth from rhizomes yielded similar results after spring and autumn harvests, plantlet regeneration was achieved from calli after 12 months in culture when media was supplemented with 2-aminoindan-2-phosphonic acid, and microrhizomes were successfully induced over a 10-week incubation period in liquid media supplemented with 8% sucrose, 6-benzylaminopurine, and 1-naphthaleneacetic acid. These findings may be used to improve conservation, reduce establishment costs, and allow for a greater supply of Miscanthus biomass in the marketplace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".