MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902542742 · doi:10.37396/jsc.v1i1.6

Penerapan Artificial Intelligence dalam Computer Aided Instructure(CAI)

2018· article· id· W2902542742 on OpenAlexaff
Chanda Halim, Hendri Prasetyo

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Sistem Cerdas · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dengan perkembangan teknologi komputer dan informasi, Artificial Intelligence (AI) digunakan dalam teknik pendidikan, dan telah menjadi kecenderungan pengembangan pendidikan komputer. Makalah ini memperkenalkan sistem instruksi dibantu komputer dan aktualitasnya, dan membahas konsepsi, objek penelitian dan ruang lingkup AI, kemudian berurusan dengan instruksi dibantu komputer cerdas berdasarkan kecerdasan buatan, akhirnya mengusulkan beberapa jenis Computer Aided Instructure(CAI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Sistem CerdasSame topicEdcuational Technology SystemsFrench-language works237,207