G-quadruplexes formation in the 5’UTRs of mRNAs associated with colorectal cancer pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RNA G-quadruplexes (rG4) are stable non-canonical secondary structures composed of G-rich sequences. Many rG4 structures located in the 5'UTRs of mRNAs act as translation repressors due to their high stability which is thought to impede ribosomal scanning. That said, it is not known if these are mRNA-specific examples, or if they are indicative of a global expression regulation mechanism of the mRNAs involved in a common pathway based on structure folding recognition. Gene-ontology analysis of mRNAs bearing a predicted rG4 motif in their 5'UTRs revealed an enrichment for mRNAs associated with the colorectal cancer pathway. Bioinformatic tools for rG4 prediction, and experimental in vitro validations were used to confirm and compare the folding of the predicted rG4s of the mRNAs associated with dysregulated pathways in colorectal cancer. The rG4 folding was confirmed for the first time for 9 mRNAs. A repressive effect of 3 rG4 candidates on the expression of a reporter gene was also measured in colorectal cancer cell lines. This work highlights the fact that rG4 prediction is not yet accurate, and that experimental characterization is still essential in order to identify the precise rG4 folding sequences and the possible common features shared between the rG4 overrepresented in important biological pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".