MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902600349 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-127280

Three-Year Follow-up of Keynote-087: Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

2019· article· en· W2902600349 on OpenAlexaff
Pier Luigi Zinzani, Hun Ju Lee, Philippe Armand, Nathalie A. Johnson, Pauline Brice, John Radford, Vincent Ribrag, Daniel Molin, Theodoros P. Vassilakopoulos, Akihiro Tomita, Bastian von Tresckow, Margaret A. Shipp, Alex F. Herrera, Jianxin Lin, Eunhee Kim, Mohammed Z.H. Farooqui, Patricia Marinello, Craig H. Moskowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabRefractory (planetary science)LymphomaOncologyInternal medicineSurgeryCancerImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Standard of care for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) remains salvage chemotherapy with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which leads to long-term remission in about half of pts. Prognosis is poor for pts who relapse or progress after ASCT, particularly among pts who relapse after prior treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV). Programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are an effective therapeutic option. Previous analyses of the multicohort phase 2 KEYNOTE-087 (NCT02453594) study showed that PD-1 pathway inhibition with pembrolizumab (pembro) led to effective antitumor activity and acceptable safety in pts with R/R cHL. KEYNOTE-087 results led to FDA approval of pembro for adult and pediatric pts with R/R cHL who relapsed after ≥3 prior lines of therapy. Long-term durability of response is a key clinical question for pts receiving immunotherapy. We present efficacy and safety of patients in KEYNOTE-087 who received 3 y of follow-up and evaluate antitumor activity in pts who were re-treated after disease progression. Methods: Pts with R/R cHL who progressed after ASCT and subsequent BV therapy (cohort 1), underwent salvage chemotherapy and BV and were ineligible for ASCT (cohort 2), or progressed after ASCT but were not treated with BV after ASCT (cohort 3) were enrolled and received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W. Pts who discontinued pembro after initial confirmed CR after ≥6 mo of treatment and then experienced disease progression were eligible to receive an additional ≤17 cycles (~1 y) of pembro (second course). Response was assessed Q12W per 2007 Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphomas. Primary end points were safety and overall response rate (ORR) per blinded independent central review in all pts in each cohort. Secondary end points included complete remission (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results : At data cutoff, median follow-up was 39.5 mo (range, 1.0-44.8). In the total population (N=210), 46 pts completed 2 y of treatment, 164 pts discontinued (primary reason, progressive disease [n=86]). ORR was 71.0% (95% CI, 64.3-77.0) with 58 CRs (27.6%) and 91 PRs (43.3%). ORR was 78.3% (CR, n=18; PR, n=36) in cohort 1 (n=69), 64.2% (CR, n=21; PR, n=31) in cohort 2 (n=81), and 71.7% (CR, n=19; PR, n=24) in cohort 3 (n=60). Overall median DOR was 16.6 mo (95% CI, 0.0+ to 39.1+). 45.1% of pts had a response duration ≥24 mo; 26.9% had a response duration ≥36 mo. 19/149 (12.8%) pts had an ongoing response. Median DOR was 25.0 mo in cohort 1, 11.1 mo in cohort 2, and 16.8 mo in cohort 3. In the total population, median PFS was 13.6 mo (95% CI, 11.1-16.7) and the 36-mo PFS rate was 18.8%. Median PFS was 16.4 mo (95% CI, 11.3-27.6) in cohort 1, 11.1 mo (95% CI, 7.3-13.5) in cohort 2, and 19.4 mo (95% CI, 8.4-22.1) in cohort 3. Median OS was not reached in the total population or in the cohorts; 36-mo OS rate was 86.4% in the total population, 86.3% in cohort 1, 85.7% in cohort 2, and 87.6% in cohort 3. 17 pts entered the second-course phase, of whom 16 were evaluable for response (8 in cohort 1, 6 in cohort 2, 2 in cohort 3). 4 pts completed 17 cycles of treatment; 7 pts have ongoing treatment. Second-course ORR was 68.8% with 5 CRs (31.3%) and 6 PRs (37.5%); 4 pts (25.0%) had stable disease. ORR for cohorts 1, 2, and 3 was 75.0% (CR, n=1; PR, n=5), 83.3% (CR, n=4; PR, n=1), and 0.0%, respectively. Both pts in cohort 3 had stable disease; 1 completed 17 cycles of pembro and the other is still receiving treatment. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurred in 72.9% of pts; the most commonly reported were hypothyroidism (14.3%), pyrexia (11.4%), fatigue (11.0%), and rash (11.0%). Grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 11.9% of pts; only neutropenia (n=5) and diarrhea (n=2) occurred in ≥2 pts. No grade 5 treatment-related AEs occurred. Conclusions: With a median of 39.5 mo of follow-up, pembro continued to demonstrate clinically important antitumor activity in pts with R/R cHL. In the total population and in pts with different treatment histories, ORRs were high and responses were durable. Second-course pembro was able to re-induce remission in most patients who previously reached CR. Safety was manageable, and no unexpected AEs occurred. Disclosures Zinzani: VERASTEM: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELLTRION: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GILEAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN-CILAG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SERVIER: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SANDOZ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; IMMUNE DESIGN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PORTOLA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSAPHARMA: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; KYOWA KIRIN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SANOFI: Consultancy. Armand:Sigma-Tau: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Merck & Co.: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Serventa: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Employment; Roche: Research Funding. Johnson:Lundbeck: Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; BD Biosciences: Other: Provided a significant proportion of the antibodies used in this project free of cost.; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Brice:Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda France: Consultancy, Honoraria. Radford:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Equity Ownership; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Ribrag:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AZ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, and expenses ; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nanostring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ArgenX: Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Other: Travel, accommodations, and expenses . Molin:Merck & Co., Inc.: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Roche Holding AG: Honoraria. Vassilakopoulos:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others; Genesis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tomita:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Taiho Pharma: Research Funding. Von Tresckow:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, gifts, and others, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp: Research Funding. Shipp:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Pha

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207