MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902718029 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab06c4

The FMOS-COSMOS Survey of Star-forming Galaxies at z ∼ 1.6. VI. Redshift and Emission-line Catalog and Basic Properties of Star-forming Galaxies

2019· article· en· W2902718029 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsGalaxyRedshiftSpectrographLuminosityLuminous infrared galaxyStellar populationPopulationRedshift surveyFlux (metallurgy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a new data release from the Fiber Multi-Object Spectrograph (FMOS)-COSMOS survey that contains the measurements of the spectroscopic redshift and flux of rest-frame optical emission lines (H α , [N ii ], [S ii ], H β , [O iii ]) for 1931 galaxies out of a total of 5484 objects observed over the 1.7 deg 2 COSMOS field. We obtained H - and J -band medium-resolution ( R ∼ 3000) spectra with FMOS mounted on the Subaru telescope, which offers an in-fiber line flux sensitivity limit of for an on-source exposure time of 5 hr. The full sample contains the main population of star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 1.6 over the stellar mass range , as well as other subsamples of infrared-luminous galaxies detected by Spitzer and Herschel at the same and lower ( z ∼ 0.9) redshifts and X-ray-emitting galaxies detected by Chandra . This paper presents an overview of our spectral analyses, a description of the sample characteristics, and a summary of the basic properties of emission-line galaxies. We use the larger sample to redefine the stellar mass–star formation rate relation based on the dust-corrected H α luminosity and find that the individual galaxies are better fit with a parameterization including a bending feature at M * ≈ 10 10.2 M ⊙ , and that the intrinsic scatter increases with M * from 0.19 to 0.37 dex. We also confirm with higher confidence that the massive ( M * ≳ 10 10.5 M ⊙ ) galaxies are chemically mature as much as local galaxies with the same stellar masses, and that the massive galaxies have lower [S ii ]/H α ratios for their [O iii ]/H β as compared to local galaxies, which is indicative of enhancement in the ionization parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207