A novel time difference of arrival localization algorithm using a neural network ensemble model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a localization system, time difference of arrival technique is widely used to estimate the location of a mobile station. To improve the performance of mobile station location estimation, a novel algorithm-based artificial neural network ensemble and time difference of arrival information is proposed in non-line-of-sight environments. Back propagation neural network is a classic artificial neural network and may be effectively used for mathematical modeling and prediction, and an artificial neural network ensemble has better generalization ability and stability than a single network. First, the parameters, such as the weights and biases of the single neural network are optimized by the ant lion optimization method which is novel and effective. Then four types of different information from the time difference of arrival measurements are respectively used to train the individual neural network. Finally, the weighted average method is improved to combine the outputs of the different individual neural network, where weights are determined by the training errors. The estimation accuracy of the locating system is evaluated through experimental measurements. The simulation results show that the proposed algorithm is efficient in improving the generalization ability and localization precision of the neural network ensemble model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it