MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902754583 · doi:10.5539/apr.v10n6p109

Enhancement of Critical Current Density of Yttrium Barium Copper Oxide Thin Films by Introducing Nano dimensional Cerium Oxide Defects

2018· article· en· W2902754583 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tochukwu Emeakaroha, F. W. James, A. Kebede

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceYttrium barium copper oxideFlux pinningYttriumPulsed laser depositionSuperconductivityThin filmCondensed matter physicsNano-OxideHigh-temperature superconductivityNanotechnologyComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The critical current density, Jc  has been the most important parameter used in the design and engineering of effective devices which is one of the implementation of high temperature superconductors (HTSC). In this work, an effort has been made to further improve the critical current density of YBa2Cu3O7-x (YBCO) thin films by preventing the magnetic flux line lattice against the Lorentz force by pinning it in place with the aid of nano-dimensional defects. These defects were generated by distributing nano sized CeO2 islands after YBCO layer was created on LaAlO3 substrates perpendicular to the film using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) technique. Three samples with buffer layers of CeO2 were prepared. CeO2 with 50 pulses, 100 pulses and 150 pulses, after each 1000 pulses of YBCO were prepared five layers for each of the samples. The structural characterization of YBCO/CeO2 and YBCO pristine films were carried out using x-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Superconducting proprieties were measured using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Jc  for the pure YBCO and the YBCO/CeO2 films were calculated from magnetization (M) versus Field (H) loops using Bean’s model. Jc  for the 50 pulses of YBCO/CeO2 films was found to be increased slightly by an order of magnitude of about 40% with respect to those of YBCO films without the nano dimensional defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207