Moth Flame Optimization Based on Golden Section Search and its Application for Link Prediction Problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moth Flame Optimization (MFO) is one of the meta-heuristic algorithms that recently proposed. MFO is inspired from the method of moths' navigation in natural world which is called transverse orientation. This paper presents an improvement of MFO algorithm based on Golden Section Search method (GSS), namely GMFO. GSS is a search method aims at locating the best maximum or minimum point in the problem search space by narrowing the interval that containing this point iteratively until a particular accuracy is reached. In this paper, the GMFO algorithm is tested on fifteen benchmark functions. Then, GMFO is applied for link prediction problem on five datasets and compared with other well-regarded meta- heuristic algorithms. Link prediction problem interests in predicting the possibility of appearing a connection between two nodes of a network, while there is no connection between these nodes in the present state of the network. Based on the experimental results, GMFO algorithm significantly improves the original MFO in solving most of benchmark functions and providing more accurate prediction results for link prediction problem for major datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".