MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902795923 · doi:10.1071/rdv31n1ab96

96 Association between metabolic diseases and fertility of high-yielding dairy cows in a transition management facility using survival analysis and machine-learning models

2018· article· en· W2902795923 on OpenAlexaff
Osvaldo Bogado Pascottini, Monica Probo, S.J. LeBlanc, G. Opsomer, Miel Hostens

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphGreo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetritisRetained placentaMedicinePregnancyMilk feverIce calvingProportional hazards modelParity (physics)ObstetricsMastitisDairy cattleHerdHazard ratioAnimal scienceGynecologyLactationInternal medicineBiologyConfidence intervalVeterinary medicineFetusPlacenta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to evaluate the association between individual and multiple metabolic diseases (MD and MD+) diagnosed during the transition period (± 3 wk relative to calving) and the probability of pregnancy until 210 days in milk (DIM) in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Disease and reproductive data from a dairy herd with 1946 calvings (n = 542 primiparous and n = 1404 multiparous cows) were analysed using a 1-year cohort. The recorded MD were milk fever, ketosis, displaced abomasum, retained placenta, metritis, twinning, and clinical mastitis. The association between the 210-DIM pregnancy risk and the MD was evaluated as MD cows (uncomplicated cases) v. MD+ cows (complicated cases) v. healthy cows (3 groups of cows). Univariable survival models were used to analyse the association of MD and MD+ with pregnancy until 210 DIM, accounting for parity. Univariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to quantify the relative risk of pregnancy per day. A hierarchically ordered decision tree and a random forest model were built to explore the importance of MD and parity on the pregnancy risk within the first 210 DIM. Parity affected the 210-DIM pregnancy risk (P < 0.001); therefore, all further analyses were stratified by parity. The incidence of MD and MD+ for primiparous and multiparous cows were 29 (n = 159) and 9% (n = 48), and 23 (n = 317) and 11% (n = 160), respectively. The overall 210-DIM pregnancy risk was 77% (n = 415) for primiparous cows and 62% (n = 879) for multiparous cows. Among healthy cows (no MD) the 210-DIM pregnancy risk was 80% (n = 269) for primiparous cows and 82% (n = 537) for multiparous cows. Conversely, the 210-DIM pregnancy risk for cows with MD or MD+ were 73 (n = 116) and 63% (n = 30) for primiparous and 48 (n = 152) and 46% (n = 74) for multiparous cows, respectively. Using the healthy cows as the reference, the 210-DIM hazard ratios for conception were 0.8 for MD [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6-1.0; P = 0.05] and 0.5 for MD+ (95% CI = 0.4-0.8; P = 0.005) for primiparous cows and 0.5 for MD (95% CI = 0.4-0.6; P < 0.001) and 0.4 for MD+ (95% CI = 0.3-0.6; P < 0.001) for multiparous cows. Parity had profound effect on the 210-DIM pregnancy risk. The hazard ratio for conception was reduced when a MD was complicated with another MD (MD+) in both primiparous and multiparous cows. Both the decision tree and random forest analysis also indicated that parity was the most influential variable reducing fertility among cows, followed by (in order of magnitude of effect) milk fever, displaced abomasum, ketosis, and clinical mastitis. Including multiple disease interactions into multivariable Cox proportional hazard models are highly likely to violate the proportional hazards assumption due to complex disease interactions. Machine-learning models represent a valid alternative to accommodate large datasets in the presence of missing values and intricate dependencies among explanatory variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207