MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902838804 · doi:10.1109/ias.2018.8544679

Experimental Investigation of Machine Learning Based Fault Diagnosis for Induction Motors

2018· article· en· W2902838804 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Zawad Ali, Md Nasmus Sakib Khan Shabbir, Xiaodong Liang, Yu Zhang, Ting Hu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatorInduction motorFault (geology)Computer scienceFeature extractionVibrationWaveletSIGNAL (programming language)Discrete wavelet transformWavelet transformControl engineeringSignal processingArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)EngineeringDigital signal processingVoltageAcousticsMechanical engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, experimental data are used to develop a practical machine learning based fault diagnosis method for induction motors. Both motor stator currents and vibration signals are measured simultaneously in experiments and used in fault diagnosis. Various single- and multi- electrical and mechanical faults are applied to two identical induction motors in experiments. Two signal processing techniques, Matching Pursuit (MP) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), for feature extraction purpose are chosen. It is found that the proposed method can accurately detect electrical and mechanical faults using several machine learning algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207