MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902868977 · doi:10.1111/cid.12696

Soft tissue augmentation at immediate implants using a novel xenogeneic collagen matrix in conjunction with immediate provisional restorations: A prospective case series

2018· article· en· W2902868977 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ignacio Sanz‐Martín, Carolina Encalada, Ignacio Sanz‐Sánchez, Javier Aracil, Mariano Sanz

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad Complutense de Madrid
KeywordsSoft tissueHard tissuePremolarBuccal administrationGingival marginMedicineCoronal planeDentistryBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceMolarAnatomySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Collagen matrices used around immediate implants may reduce morbidity although there is limited evidence on their performance. Purpose To evaluate soft and hard tissue changes when combining immediate implants, hard and soft tissue grafting, and an immediate provisional restoration. Material and Methods In 12 patients, immediate implants were placed in the anterior maxillary and first premolar area together with a xenogeneic bone substitute. Then a xenogeneic collagen matrix was placed under the buccal mucosal margin with an immediate provisional restoration. Study casts and clinical measurements were taken before extraction (Baseline/BS) at 6 months (6M) and 12 months (1Y) after implant placement. Files from the scanned casts were matched to calculate the linear and volumetric changes at the buccal tissues. Cone Bean Computed Tomographies (CBCTs) were taken prior to extraction and at 6M. The superimposed DICOM files allowed for assessing hard tissue changes and the superimposition of DICOM and STL files allowed for evaluating of soft tissue thickness at BS and 6M. Results After 6 months, the horizontal tissue contours decreased 0.66 ± 0.57 mm, concomitant with a horizontal bone loss of 1.31 ± 1.32 mm, measured 1 mm below the most coronal aspect of the ridge. In contrast, the soft tissue thickness, 1 mm below the gingival margin, increased 0.75 ± 1.12 mm. At 1‐year, tissue contours had decreased 1.01 ± 0.67 mm compared to BS reaching statistical significance. The mean volume loss after 1Y was 20.43 ± 11.70 mm3 while the mean mucosal margin recession was 0.86 ± 0.67 mm. These changes had a limited clinical impact as the PES Scores remained stable. Conclusions The tested protocol resulted in a significant reduction of the tissue contours and osseous ridge dimensions that was partially compensated by a non‐significant increase in soft tissue thickness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchSame topicDental Implant Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207