A LC-MS/MS-Based Approach to Studying the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cca1 Protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The enzyme ATP (CTP): tRNA-specific tRNA nucleotidyltransferase (tRNA-NT) is an essential enzyme in eukaryotes and some prokaryotes and plays a critical role in tRNA maturation. This enzyme is responsible for the addition of AMP and CMP residues to the 3’-ends of tRNA molecules to allow for their aminoacylation and subsequent use in protein synthesis. The tRNA-NT (Cca1) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast), although encoded by a single nuclear gene (CCA1), functions in multiple cellular compartments (cytosol, nucleus, and mitochondrion). Here we used mass spectrometry to explore both cis- and trans-acting factors that could provide clues to the importance of the function and localization of this enzyme in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We characterized post-translational modifications on the native enzyme and analyzed the proteomes of native and temperature-sensitive (ts) yeast strains at permissive (20oC and 30oC) and quasi-restrictive (33oC) temperatures. \nOur experiments identified amino acids cysteine 307, lysine 312 and tyrosine 317 in one α-helix as sites of post-translational modifications in early log phase showing acetylation, acetylation and phosphorylation, respectively. As these modifications were present, this may suggest that these post-translational modifications play a role in protein function or localization. \nAs we have identified a mutation in the gene coding for tRNA-NT that leads to a temperature-sensitive phenotype, we set out to do a comparison of the proteome profiles of this strain and the native yeast strain from which it was derived. This study revealed specific differences between the native and ts strains and between the different temperatures tested. Levels of stress-response proteins (Ctt1, Ddp1, Gad1, Prx1, Sod2, Tdh1, Uga1, and Uga2) were increased in the variant but not the native strain at 33°C but not in either the native or the variant at any other temperature tested (20°C or 30°C). This suggests that in the ts strain, the stress response is induced to combat the loss of activity associated with the variant tRNA-NT. In addition, a number of mitochondrial or ribosomal proteins such as Aim24, Atp20, Cox2, Cox5A, Mhr1, Nuc1, Rip1, Drs1, Edc3, Hca4, Nog2, Nsa2, Rlp7, Sod1, Sof1, Tsr4, Utp23 whose levels differ in the native and variant proteomes were identified, suggesting pathways to be explored to explain the ts phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".