MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902882914 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2017-505

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM FOR MACHINE SELECTION IN METALWORKING INDUSTRY

2017· article· en· W2902882914 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hoai-Nam Dinh, Shang-Liang Cheng, Cheng-Ru Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUploadMachine toolComputer scienceMetalworkingMachiningSoftwareManufacturing engineeringExpert systemDatabaseEngineering drawingEngineeringMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, a knowledge-based system with a function module in manufacturing processing is used to recommend machining algorithms and to provide a cost analysis for manufacturers and clients. In each manufacturing segment, metal processing plants will be able to upload an engineering drawing into a machine information database system. Machine processing capability for management work is then analyzed via Siemens PLM Software NX. The result of the analysis includes axes of movement, mass, volume, accuracy, surface roughness, geometric features and other information uploaded into the database system. Users select the recommended machine specification requirements and establish a postprocessor. This research aims to improve the customized manufacturing and manufacturing capabilities of metal processing companies in order to quickly respond to the target date and to integrate the three technical keywords “Selecting machine system”, “Cost estimation” and “Machine recommendation algorithms”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207