Deep Transfer Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperspectral image (HSI) includes a vast quantities of samples, large number of bands, as well as randomly occurring redundancy. Classifying such complex data is challenging, and the classification performance generally is affected significantly by the amount of labeled training samples. Collecting such labeled training samples is labor and time consuming, motivating the idea of borrowing and reusing labeled samples from other preexisting related images. Therefore transfer learning, which can mitigate the semantic gap between existing and new HSI, has recently drawn increasing research attention. However, existing transfer learning methods for HSI which concentrated on how to overcome the divergence among images, may neglect the high level latent features during the transfer learning process. In this paper, we present two novel ideas based on this observation. We propose constructing and connecting higher level features for the source and target HSI data, to further overcome the cross-domain disparity. Different from existing methods, no priori knowledge on the target domain is needed for the proposed classification framework, and the proposed framework works for both homogeneous and heterogenous HSI data. Experimental results on real world hyperspectral images indicate the significance of the proposed method in HSI classification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".