Modelling of phase equilibria of LiFePO<sub>4</sub>‐FePO<sub>4</sub> olivine join for cathode material
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A thermodynamic model for the FePO4‐LiFePO4 olivine join has been developed in order to provide support for the understanding of the charge transport behaviour within the cathode material during the battery operation. The Gibbs energy model for the olivine solution is based on the compound energy formalism with long‐range‐order and has been calibrated using the CALPHAD method, permitting the computation of phase equilibria by Gibbs energy minimization techniques. The model can simultaneously reproduce the reported eutectoid reaction, the 3 low‐temperature miscibility gaps, the enthalpy of mixing, and the change of the voltage plateau with temperature during the delithiation process, in agreement with the available experimental data. The spinodal decomposition, which is possibly associated with fast charge transport within the cathode material, involves up to two sub‐spinodal decompositions. Hence, the unique low‐temperature miscibility gap of this system is considered as a blend of the two sub‐miscibility gaps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".