4 Induction of ovulation by kisspeptin in llamas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After mating, female camelids ovulate in response to nerve growth factor (NGF) present in semen (formerly referred to as ovulation-inducing factor). The ovulatory effect appears to be induced by stimulation of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal activity and LH secretion. Recent studies have identified kisspeptin as an important mediator of GnRH secretion in several species. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that kisspeptin is involved in the ovulatory pathway in llamas and investigated the mechanism of this effect. In Experiment 1, ovarian function in non-pregnant, non-lactating adult female llamas was synchronized by intramuscular administration of a GnRH analogue (50 µg of gonadorelin acetate; Fertiline, Vetoquinol, Quebec, QC, Canada). When a growing dominant follicle =8 mm in diameter was detected, llamas were assigned randomly to 3 treatment groups and given an intravenous dose of purified seminal NGF (1 mg, single dose; n = 5), kisspeptin (0.1 mg kg-1 of body weight, 2 doses 1 h apart; n = 5), or PBS (n = 4). The bioactive 10 amino acid fragment of murine kisspeptin was used. Ovulation and corpus luteum development were assessed by transrectal ultrasonography every other day from the day of treatment (Day 0) to Day 8. In Experiment 2, ovarian function among female llamas was synchronized, as in Experiment 1. When a growing dominant follicle =8 mm in diameter was detected, llamas were given kisspeptin (0.1 mg kg-1 of body weight IV, 2 doses 1 h apart) beginning 2 h after pretreatment with either a GnRH receptor blocker (cetrorelix acetate, 1.5 mg per llama IV; Sigma, Oakville, ON, Canada; n = 6) or saline (n = 6). Llamas were examined 48 h later by transrectal ultrasonography to detect ovulation and 8 days later to determine the presence of a corpus luteum. Chi-square tests were used to compare ovulation rates, and ANOVA for repeated measures was used to compare diameter profiles of the corpus luteum. In Experiment 1, ovulation rate did not differ between the NGF and kisspeptin groups (5/5 in each; 100%) and was greater than in the control group (0/4; 0% P < 0.05). Corpus luteum diameter did not differ between llamas that ovulated in response to treatment with NGF or kisspeptin (13.2 ± 0.8 and 14.0 ± 1.2 mm on Day 8, respectively). In Experiment 2, none of the llamas pretreated with cetrorelix ovulated in response to kisspeptin treatment (0/6; 0%), whereas all of the llamas pretreated with saline ovulated in response to kisspeptin treatment and had a corpus luteum at Day 8 (6/6; 100%; P < 0.05). Results supported the hypothesis that kisspeptin induces ovulation in llamas. Because a GnRH receptor antagonist blocked ovulation, our interpretation is that the site of action of kisspeptin is upstream of the pituitary gland and involves control of GnRH release from the hypothalamus. These findings raise the possibility that kisspeptin mediates the ovulation-inducing effect of NGF. Research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".