MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902987119 · doi:10.1002/mop.31535

A compact ultra‐wideband antenna with three C‐shaped slots for notched band characteristics

2018· article· en· W2902987119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWiMAXWidebandBandwidth (computing)Antenna efficiencyAntenna (radio)C bandRadiation patternFrequency bandUltra-widebandRadio spectrumSlot antennaAntenna measurementOpticsAcousticsMaterials sciencePhysicsElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a compact UWB (ultra‐wideband) antenna with three C‐shaped slots for notched band characteristics is presented. The proposed antenna covers a bandwidth between 2.95 GHz and 12 GHz. Three different sizes of C‐shaped slot are integrated in the radiating element to remove three frequency bands at WiMAX (3.2‐3.8 GHz), C‐band (3.7‐4.2 GHz), and WLAN (5.15‐5.85 GHz). The antenna has a compact size (30 × 30 mm 2 ). The simulated results show good and acceptable agreement with measurement results in terms of S‐parameters and radiation patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it