MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2902992645 · doi:10.7202/1053868ar

Questionnaire d’aiguillage pour dépister les besoins de formation quant à l’offre active de services en français

2018· article· fr· W2902992645 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lynn Casimiro, Jacinthe Savard, Katrine Sauvé-Schenk, Nicole Atchessi

Bibliographic record

VenueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaStatistics CanadaInstitut du Savoir Montfort
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceForestryGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Des recherches antérieures montrent que certaines caractéristiques personnelles influencent la fréquence des comportements d’offre active des professionnelles et professionnels de la santé et du travail social. Un nouveau questionnaire d’aiguillage rempli par des étudiantes et étudiants de ces domaines aux niveaux collégial et universitaire a permis de déterminer leurs caractéristiques (profil sociolangagier) et de cibler des besoins en formation à l’offre active. Des formations en ligne, repérées parmi les formations déjà sur le Web, leur ont ensuite été proposées, en fonction de leur profil. Nos données montrent qu’il est possible de dresser des profils sociolangagiers utiles pour identifier des besoins de formation d’une manière acceptable pour les répondantes et répondants. Le type de formation qui répondra le mieux aux besoins de chaque profil reste à évaluer 1 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaireSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207