MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903027344 · doi:10.3917/enf2.183.0407

Développement des agressions physiques de la petite enfance à l’âge adulte

2018· article· fr· W2903027344 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfance · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsResearch Unit on Children's Psychosocial Maladjustment
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il est une idée très répandue, et confirmée par un rapport de l’Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, selon laquelle les adolescents physiquement violents ont appris à agresser de leur environnement pendant leur adolescence. Cet article rappelle les opinions de quelques philosophes célèbres, ainsi que les résultats d’études longitudinales récentes, dans plusieurs pays occidentaux, qui suggèrent que les jeunes humains n’ont probablement jamais eu besoin de modèles pour apprendre à exprimer leurs colères et arriver à leurs fins par des agressions physiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.458 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it