Development of Multifarious Cueing Systems for Cost-Effective Flight Simulation Training Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This project was an investigation for the development of a high-quality cost-effective Cessna 172 type-specific flight simulation training device. The Carleton University redeveloped vector simulator (CURVS) research program consisted of multiple microprojects that were distributed to a team of researchers in the Applied Dynamics Laboratory (ADL) at Carleton University. The main objective of the project was to develop technologies by putting together commercial-off-the-shelf components to build a flight simulation training device that is relatively inexpensive and therefore accessible to smaller flight schools. Visual cueing, vibratory cueing, and sound cueing systems that were developed for the CURVS are the topics of discussion in this thesis. I'd like to acknowledge the staff, faculty, students, and the industry partner who made this amazing research opportunity possible. Robert Langlois, my patient and stunning supervisor; Robert Connors, graceful CEO of Waterloo Wellington Flying Centre who was our industry partner; Brent Cameron, who I
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".